Review Request 129716: Improve installation process of KPackage bundles
Marco Martin
notmart at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 16:43:55 UTC 2016
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129716/#review101629
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Dec. 28, 2016, 4:33 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129716/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 28, 2016, 4:33 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
>
>
> Repository: kpackage
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> When parsing the desktop files, pass together the kpackage-generic.desktop service type, so that the parser knows its intrinsic types (most especially `X-KPackage-Dependencies` which is in fact added now). This is important because otherwise we get warnings when we extract the value when the package is a desktop file.
>
> This would be much less of a problem if desktop service types could be extended, but it's not the case at the moment.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/kpackage/data/servicetypes/kpackage-generic.desktop 879d3b2
> src/kpackage/package.cpp c032e6e
> src/kpackage/private/packagejobthread.cpp 8697341
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129716/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Managed to install llukas's example.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20161228/9135a147/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list