Review Request 127754: Use kbuildsycoca5 executable that was just built, not the one from the system

[Jos van den Oever]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127754/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated apr 27, 2016, 12:47 p.m.)


Status
------

This change has been discarded.


Review request for KDE Frameworks.


Repository: kservice


Description
-------

This test was using QStandardPaths::findExecutable to find buildsycoca5. So the test was testing with the wrong buildsycoca5.

I've added a function findFile() that looks for buildsycoca5 in the build directory.


Diffs
-----

  autotests/ksycoca_xdgdirstest.cpp f879959 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127754/diff/


Testing
-------

I ran the unit tests. Some now pass for me, but on my system still some are failing.


Thanks,

Jos van den Oever

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160427/bdb3f4ff/attachment.html>