Review Request 125272: KSycoca: rebuild sycoca in-process in most unittests as well.
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Wed Sep 16 22:04:46 UTC 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125272/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Albert Astals Cid.
Repository: kservice
Description
-------
This tests what happens now in applications, in order to catch any possible
issues with the in-process rebuild.
On the other hand, I left the QProcess usage in ksycocatest, so that this
one ensures the kbuildsycoca5 binary still works.
This change caught a nasty code path where the sycoca-header-check
during rebuild would actually trigger a rebuild, which would deadlock
on the lockfile. This bug was already in 5.14.0 but there the symptom
was harder to spot due to the process separation (constant rebuild, bug 352787).
Diffs
-----
autotests/kmimeassociationstest.cpp 5550938abe4d9c9c1ee698ac1b225312690e4aa6
autotests/kservicetest.cpp ffd963dfc99fb52ce9c8546defc7148c1a982858
autotests/ksycocadicttest.cpp 52ce426fe2a0020f1952389420493f3ff6f32092
autotests/ksycocathreadtest.cpp 29a096fea2b1d315a4ca13e241a383d410fd157a
src/sycoca/ksycoca.cpp c5465a828da615e87220304e3f8b160d471edbc7
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125272/diff/
Testing
-------
unittests
Thanks,
David Faure
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150916/53d03dc7/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list