Review Request 125531: Mark KProcess::pid() as depreciated
David Edmundson
david at davidedmundson.co.uk
Wed Oct 7 13:34:38 UTC 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125531/#review86448
-----------------------------------------------------------
src/lib/io/kprocess.h (line 320)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125531/#comment59564>
I don't get this comment non unix comment.
This ::pid() override does exactly what QProcess::processId() does
qint64 QProcess::processId() const
{
Q_D(const QProcess);
#ifdef Q_OS_WIN
return d->pid ? d->pid->dwProcessId : 0;
#else
return d->pid;
#endif
}
So it is a 1-1 drop in replacement
- David Edmundson
On Oct. 5, 2015, 3:31 p.m., Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125531/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 5, 2015, 3:31 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kcoreaddons
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> QProcess::pid() has been depreciated since Qt5.3 - the replacement QProcess::processId() is not a drop-in replacement on non-UNIX systems.
>
> I'm not positive this is the correct way of doing this.
>
> http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprocess.html#processId
> http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprocess-obsolete.html#pid
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/lib/io/kprocess.h d57061c
> src/lib/io/kprocess.cpp 1df61c0
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125531/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> tests pass
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt Hindenburg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20151007/649ff7b2/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list