Versioning of Frameworks

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Tuesday 05 May 2015 11:45:19 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 09:45 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:00:32 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > > You don't have to maintain any other combinations that what you already
> > > do.
> > > Just because the cmake versions aren't automatically bumped doesn't mean
> > > you suddenly have to test every conceivable combination of versions.
> > 
> > How can the developer write in KIO's CMakeLists.txt "this depends on
> > KXmlGui
> > 5.5 and KCoreAddons 5.2" without testing that it actually works with
> > these versions?
> 
> Because he tested that when he originally added that dependency, and
> never changed anything related to that.

That's wishful thinking, isn't it? I already gave you examples on how we 
regularly forget to increase the required versions in KWin .

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150505/b7c5aadd/attachment.sig>