KPeople part of KDE Frameworks

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 01:47:00, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> I would just like to point out that the review period of KPeople
> is over and all the associated moves are in order, are they not?
> What exactly is "enormously rushed" when the review period
> is over and moves are rightfully requested? Perhaps that should
> have been said in either of the "please review this proposal" emails
> before, not after.
> 
> KDE Telepathy also already has a dependency on KPeople
> since ever, so there's no new dependency added. It's just being
> moved from kdereview to frameworks. Is that a dependency
> freeze violation? I read "it is not allowed to add new dependencies"
> in the release schedule page. That is not what is happening.
> 
> The only rush is to get KPeople tarball released a bit sooner so
> that it can be there for KDE Applications Beta 1. That is all.
> And that tarball could just as well be made from kdereview.

We have some rules, one of them is that when we release a tarball, it must be 
able to be compiled against other released tarballs. I hope that's not hard to 
agree on.

So we need the KPeople tarball before KDE Applications 15.04 Beta 1 is out. 

Now KPeople wants to be a framework and thus is not on the same relase 
schedule as KDE Applications 15.04.

So to achieve the "tarballs have to compile against released tarballs" KPeople 
should have been part of the past release, not of Frameworks release that is 
after KDE Applications 15.04 Beta 1 is released.

Thus KPeople was late and we had to rush it a bit.

> 
> (and yes I'm a bit annoyed by all this crap I'm getting for this
> only now and not a month before when was the right time)

I'm sorry you're getting annoyed by people trying to make sure we collectively 
follow the few rules we have given ourselves.

If you don't agree with the rules you're more than welcome to propose 
improvements or modifications, maybe that way we will get more people caring 
and following them.

Best Regards,
  Albert

> 
> Well thanks everyone anyway, you've done enormously good jobs.
> I owe you one.
> 
> Cheers