CI Failures

[Scarlett Clark]

As Ben stated bo patches. I will turn off kf5-minimum until I get back home
and,we can all agree on a solution. Cheers Scarlett
On Jul 31, 2015 11:28 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El Divendres, 31 de juliol de 2015, a les 20:57:37, Ben Cooksley va
> escriure:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:14 PM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:
> > > On Friday 31 July 2015 04:25:53 no-reply at kde.org wrote:
> > >> GENERAL INFO
> > >>
> > >> BUILD FAILURE
> > >> Build URL:
> > >>
> https://build.kde.org/job/kiconthemes%20master%20kf5-minimum/PLATFORM=Li
> > >> nux,compiler=gcc/1/>>
> > >  rsync: change_dir
> > >
> "/srv/jenkins/install/ubuntu/x86_64/g++//kf5-minimum/kdesupport/extra-cm
> > >  ake-modules/inst" failed: No such file or directory (2)>
> > > Hi Scarlett,
> > > is there a way to disable all notifications until CI is repaired? (I
> > > assume these errors are a consequence of the disk full situation).
> > >
> > > Otherwise people will learn to just ignore the CI failure emails,
> which is
> > > bad for the long run....
> > This is because extra-cmake-modules hasn't been built, which is
> > because qt5 for k5-minimum hasn't been built (and I don't see a job
> > for it because it is currently set to a tag, which I suspect the code
> > does not support).
>
> It does support tags, it's just not building because it needs the patch i
> sent
> to this list the other day to build, Scarlett told me she'd have a look at
> how
> to make the build include that patch but i guess she hasn't had time yet.
>
> >
> > Building Qt is becoming a huge too hard basket job these days. I've
> > copied stable-kf5-qt5's Qt over to kf5-minimum (which has suddenly
> > decided to start building itself...) to resolve this issue. This means
> > kf5-minimum isn't really that, but it'll shut the CI system up at
> > least.
> >
> > Can we please bump the required version of Qt for Frameworks to
> > something which is buildable without needing patches?
>
> The first branch that builds with such a newer glib as the one we're using
> is
> Qt 5.4 and I guess that is unacceptable from the KDE Frameworks point of
> view.
>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
> >
> > We're going to have to drastically rethink how we structure the CI
> > system, due to the extremely differing requirements of various parts
> > of KDE which wasn't really the case in the past. What Frameworks wants
> > and what everyone else wants just differs way too much. Doesn't help
> > that Qt doesn't keep itself buildable on modern OSes...
> >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben
> >
> > > --
> > > David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
> > > Working on KDE Frameworks 5
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> > > Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> > Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150731/fcaf98ef/attachment-0001.html>