CI Failures

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Divendres, 31 de juliol de 2015, a les 20:57:37, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:14 PM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:
> > On Friday 31 July 2015 04:25:53 no-reply at kde.org wrote:
> >> GENERAL INFO
> >> 
> >> BUILD FAILURE
> >> Build URL:
> >> https://build.kde.org/job/kiconthemes%20master%20kf5-minimum/PLATFORM=Li
> >> nux,compiler=gcc/1/>> 
> >  rsync: change_dir
> >  "/srv/jenkins/install/ubuntu/x86_64/g++//kf5-minimum/kdesupport/extra-cm
> >  ake-modules/inst" failed: No such file or directory (2)> 
> > Hi Scarlett,
> > is there a way to disable all notifications until CI is repaired? (I
> > assume these errors are a consequence of the disk full situation).
> > 
> > Otherwise people will learn to just ignore the CI failure emails, which is
> > bad for the long run....
> This is because extra-cmake-modules hasn't been built, which is
> because qt5 for k5-minimum hasn't been built (and I don't see a job
> for it because it is currently set to a tag, which I suspect the code
> does not support).

It does support tags, it's just not building because it needs the patch i sent 
to this list the other day to build, Scarlett told me she'd have a look at how 
to make the build include that patch but i guess she hasn't had time yet.

> 
> Building Qt is becoming a huge too hard basket job these days. I've
> copied stable-kf5-qt5's Qt over to kf5-minimum (which has suddenly
> decided to start building itself...) to resolve this issue. This means
> kf5-minimum isn't really that, but it'll shut the CI system up at
> least.
> 
> Can we please bump the required version of Qt for Frameworks to
> something which is buildable without needing patches?

The first branch that builds with such a newer glib as the one we're using is 
Qt 5.4 and I guess that is unacceptable from the KDE Frameworks point of view.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> We're going to have to drastically rethink how we structure the CI
> system, due to the extremely differing requirements of various parts
> of KDE which wasn't really the case in the past. What Frameworks wants
> and what everyone else wants just differs way too much. Doesn't help
> that Qt doesn't keep itself buildable on modern OSes...
> 
> > Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 
> > --
> > David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
> > Working on KDE Frameworks 5
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> > Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel