Review Request 124319: Add missing licenses

[Maximiliano Curia]

> On July 10, 2015, 12:49 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > absolute no ShipIt. Maintainer veto!
> > 
> > 
> > This needs proper fixing, just changing the license is no solution! Please refer to the discussion I just sent to the mailing list. It would be nice if such important changes don't get pushed after a 3 min review, but at least waited for the maintainer to have a chance to look at it.

It's not a change in the license, it just adds the licenses already referenced in the distributed files.


- Maximiliano


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124319/#review82328
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 10, 2015, 12:48 p.m., Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124319/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 10, 2015, 12:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kglobalaccel
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The distributed tarballs include GPL-2 po files (po/bg), and the
> src/runtime/main.cpp file is under LGPL-2 only, thus the included LGPL-2.1
> won't cover it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   COPYING.GPL-2 PRE-CREATION 
>   COPYING.LGPL-2 PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124319/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maximiliano Curia
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150710/1b4433c7/attachment.html>