Review Request 124600: Update kdeinit5 docbook

[David Faure]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124600/#review83361
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/kdeinit5/man-kdeinit5.8.docbook (line 46)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124600/#comment57606>

    This reads strangely. I suggest:
    
    Launcher for applications built with kdeinit support, and for KIO slaves.
    
    Or if it should stay short, then the original was OK (this is the process launcher developed by the KDE community)



docs/kdeinit5/man-kdeinit5.8.docbook (line 241)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124600/#comment57605>

    LOL, this is somewhat pessimistic ;)
    I guess in 2008 it seemed that way indeed.


- David Faure


On Aug. 3, 2015, 6:29 a.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 3, 2015, 6:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kinit
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> add missing lang="&language;" to refentry
> fix title
> fix date + releaseinfo
> add productinfo
> 
> Hint:
> There is no kdekillall in kf5 so far
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/kdeinit5/man-kdeinit5.8.docbook 973207a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124600/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150803/5713d260/attachment.html>