Review Request 123206: Don't try to highlight if there is no spell checker found
Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
martin.sandsmark at kde.org
Thu Apr 9 20:08:23 UTC 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123206/#review78722
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
On April 1, 2015, 11:46 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123206/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 1, 2015, 11:46 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
>
>
> Repository: sonnet
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Don't try to highlight if there is no spell checker found
>
> It's slightly wasteful to do a re-highlight, more important without this we max out the CPU usage as rehighlightRequest singleShot is still false (see line 120 in the constructor), so this timer constantly retriggers with no interval.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/ui/highlighter.cpp 05c72ec
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123206/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> ran textedit example without my CPU usage skyrocketing.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Edmundson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150409/819b11c0/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list