What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Thursday 18 September 2014 06:46:53 Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> On 17 Sep 2014, at 08:32 , Martin Gräßlin <mgraesslin at kde.org> wrote:
> > If the minimum is 5.2 it would obviously be best to test compile
> > frameworks
> > against 5.2. But that might make things more difficult on the CI system as
> > we have software depending on 5.3.
> 
> this thread makes it seem as if one needs to build against the latest stable
> as well as against qt5’s head revision. This would require two CI system
> configurations to be run for everything…
> 
> That doesn’t sound like a viable way to me, as it doubles CI efforts.

That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require 
only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon 
5.4). This will require two Qt builds, while we currently have only one. But 
it doesn't require that everything is compiled twice.

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140918/5d87ab33/attachment.sig>