Move KDED out of frameworks?

[Kevin Krammer]

On Friday, 2014-03-28, 12:54:42, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Àlex Fiestas <afiestas at kde.org> wrote:
> > On Friday 28 March 2014 11:30:25 Alex Merry wrote:
> > > In principle, I agree.  In practice, a lot of our frameworks have a
> > > runtime dependency of some sort on it.[0]
> > > 
> > > Alex
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [0]: http://lxr.kde.org/search?v=kf5-qt5&_filestring=&_string=kded5
> > 
> > I can't talk for other frameworks but in the case of Solid it is a mistake
> > since it makes code that is cross-platform not cross-platform anymore.
> > 
> > During the next week I will either remove that or make it platform
> > specific
> > (kde integration).
> 
> Well yes, actually we should (re-)consider whether frameworks that depend
> on QtDBus in general if they're cross-platform or not. [1]

D-Bus does run on most platforms, at least on desktop.
There was a thread on the Qt development list a short while ago which 
discussed enabling QtDBus by default in Windows and Mac builds.

Cheers,
Kevin
-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140328/5d75e48d/attachment.sig>