KCoreAddons does not install most of its headers on my system
Alex Merry
alex.merry at kde.org
Fri Jun 20 18:19:59 UTC 2014
On 19/06/14 00:32, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org
> <mailto:bcooksley at kde.org>> wrote:
> Note though that I consider this a workaround for an upstream
> regression which we have detected.
> One of the reasons the CI system runs the next branch is to detect
> such regressions before they end up in a release and impact us.
> Well, we need to make sure that we're using the cmake version that is
> useful for KDE developers, not for cmake.
>
> At the moment, the situation we are in is not acceptable where CI in
> general is totally unreliable.Furthermore, it's quite unlikely that
> we'll get to depend on 3.1 anytime soon, especially given that we're not
> requiring 3.0.
It's not a question of depending on 3.1. It's a matter of people using
3.1 when they compile frameworks. For example, I use ArchLinux and so
tend to have the latest released version of a given piece of software.
Alex
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list