Review Request 118680: Reorder Tests

Aleix Pol Gonzalez aleixpol at kde.org
Fri Jun 13 13:25:23 UTC 2014



> On June 12, 2014, 10:07 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > autotests/CMakeLists.txt, line 53
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118680/diff/1/?file=280375#file280375line53>
> >
> >     Why did you need to create a separate call to ecm_add_test?
> >     
> >     If it's for the target_include_directories, you can still do it to an ecm_add_tests created target.
> 
> Thomas Braxton wrote:
>     No, because it depends on KConfigUtils, so it should be after test_kconfigutils.

Aren't ecm_add_tests being added consecutively?


- Aleix


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118680/#review59855
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 11, 2014, 11:04 p.m., Thomas Braxton wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118680/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 11, 2014, 11:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
> 
> 
> Repository: kconfig
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests are testing underlying components, these should be tested before testing the components that depend on them.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 02885e7101bfd4239d3fb64f2940cb80933570b7 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118680/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests still pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas Braxton
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140613/49ad5ccf/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list