Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Michael Palimaka]

On 01/25/2014 08:19 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not
>>>>>> appear
>>>>>> to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> it would fit in tier 1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kwallet is in tier 2, but since
>>>>>> b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27
>>>>>> it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> still belong in tier 2?
>>>>>
>>>>> kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies,
>>>>> AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it
>>>> automatically becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier
>>>> 2.
>>>
>>> OK, then it's tier3 :-)
>>
>> Please make sure http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List is up to date
>> then.
> 
> Done. Also updated kde-build-metadata (minor change).

kwallet-framework.yaml in the repo will need updating too. :-)