Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Valentin Rusu]

On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not
> > > > > appear
> > > > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks
> > > > > like
> > > > > it would fit in tier 1?
> > > > > 
> > > > > kwallet is in tier 2, but since
> > > > > b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27
> > > > > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does
> > > > > it
> > > > > still belong in tier 2?
> > > > 
> > > > kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies,
> > > > AFAIK.
> > > 
> > > If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it
> > > automatically becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier
> > > 2.
> > 
> > OK, then it's tier3 :-)
> 
> Please make sure http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List is up to date
> then.

Done. Also updated kde-build-metadata (minor change).

> 
> Cheers.

-- 
Valentin Rusu
irc: valir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140124/73a5ab3c/attachment.sig>