Review Request 115292: Do Configure Checks in the Correct Language

[Alex Merry]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/#review48219
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/ConfigureChecks.cmake
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/#comment34106>

    This is the underlying cause of the issue.  I think the reason your changes fix it is the same reason removing the -std=iso9899:1990 fixes it; GCC auto-enables various bits of functionality based on the -std variable, and the one for CXX is -std=c++0x.


- Alex Merry


On Jan. 24, 2014, 1:55 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2014, 1:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde4support
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A recent change in ECM revealed an issue with ConfigureChecks.cmake, where the check_symbol_exist calls would use the C compiler (with CFLAGS) and the compilation would happen in C++ (with CXXFLAGS). This change ports all checks to CXX where possible.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/ConfigureChecks.cmake 7c8951f 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Refreshed builds for ECM and KDE4Support, both building OK
> 2.  $ grep HAVE_GETADDRINFO src/config-network.h 
> #define HAVE_GETADDRINFO 1
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Narváez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140124/5142476f/attachment.html>