Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Valentin Rusu]

On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear
> > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like
> > > it would fit in tier 1?
> > > 
> > > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27
> > > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does it
> > > still belong in tier 2?
> > 
> > kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies,
> > AFAIK.
> 
> If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it
> automatically becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier 2.

OK, then it's tier3 :-)

> 
> Regards.

-- 
Valentin Rusu
irc: valir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140123/f65bb6a3/attachment.sig>