Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Kevin Ottens]

On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear
> > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like
> > it would fit in tier 1?
> > 
> > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27
> > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does it
> > still belong in tier 2?
> 
> kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies,
> AFAIK.

If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it automatically 
becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier 2.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140122/fe69ea69/attachment.sig>