Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Kevin Krammer]

On Wednesday, 2014-01-22, 17:35:50, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear
> > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like
> > it would fit in tier 1?
> 
> The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it could be a
> framework but I'd appreciate someone more knowledgeable giving it an
> eye over to work out if anything else needs to be done to make it a
> framework.
> 
> > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27
> > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does it
> > still belong in tier 2?
> 
> Another possibility would be to move kwalletd into a separate git
> repository but I guess nobody is likely to use the library without the
> daemon so tier 3 seems more sensible.

I guess it mostly depends on whether KF wallet is tied to kwalletd or is a 
client library for any spec conformant secret service.
In the first case there is no point in stripping it out, in the second case it 
might be viable.

I have to admit I totally lost the overview over the state of transition to 
secret service, so that might be another unrelated framework.

Cheers,
Kevin
-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140122/b593fc89/attachment.sig>