KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Wednesday 19 February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote:
> i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE
> release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned
> frameworks licenses.
> Details in the links bellow (basically, certain files are not licensed as
> per contained license).
> Should those files be re-licensed, or should those frameworks have dual
> license?

Interesting, that's all files which were previously in kdelibs AFAICT and with 
the same copyright header... funny that it shows up only now. I'm also 
wondering if the one about solid isn't a false positive.

I think that we should re-license the problematic files.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140220/bd34f4c3/attachment.sig>