kf5 alpha 1 : attica?

[Kevin Ottens]

On Wednesday 05 February 2014 18:39:51 David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2014 09:55:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > I can do the changes if needed. It just needs the changes here:
> > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes under "Build System"
> > ?
> 
> No, it should follow all the things that other frameworks do. Compare with
> e.g. kcoreaddons or even generate the template with kdeexamples/framework-
> template. Or one of us with more ecm/kf5 experience can do it. The main
> point is an agreement from the attica maintainer(s).

In other words, to be part of KDE Frameworks it needs to follow the policies 
listed there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies

(buildsystem and framework-template is part of the list of course)

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140205/c1f93ba6/attachment.sig>