Kioslave repos

Kevin Ottens ervin at kde.org
Thu Apr 10 11:32:06 UTC 2014


On Thursday 10 April 2014 10:40:04 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 11:57:37 Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > > I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less
> > > if
> > > it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4.
> > > 
> > > So we wither split it and hope somebody will give love to it or remove
> > > it.
> > 
> > Not talking about that repo in particular, but...
> > on the other hand, putting stuff in own micro repositories is as swiping
> > under the carpet as leaving them in one of the main ones, if anything it
> > ensures even more that it will go abandoned and unnoticed.
> > If it's stuff that really nobody is even using and is safe to drop, that's
> > ok (would be even ok to just delete it tough)
> > 
> > but if is something that the user needs anyways and potentially causes
> > regressions in the experience, it has to stay, and in the place that goes
> > the least unnoticed.
> > Developers being confortable with it, or even (gasp!) being actively
> > maintained goes completely secondary behind the causing as less
> > regressions
> > as possible for the users.
> 
> I guess you can leave the code there and just not add it to cmake,

Huh? I hope you realize that's the same than putting it in a micro-repository 
no one builds... I think that Marco meant stay in the least unnoticed place 
*and* built by default (seemed obvious to me, although it was implicit).

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140410/99f5b207/attachment.sig>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list