Kioslave repos

[Kevin Ottens]

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 14:31:51 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 08/04/14 14:02, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I personally do not want to have those not of interest or unmaintained
> > kiosalves around, I do not want to maintain them, I do not want distros to
> > ship them by default (which will happen for those distros that will
> > pacakge
> > the entire repository) etc.
> > 
> > Maybe we can move them to unmaintain (there is such place in our git repos
> > I think)  or something like that, but I really think that kio_cgi does
> > not belong near smb.
> 
> Well, I would say: discard them or include them.  I know Albert was
> pushing not to get rid of code that still technically works, but I think
> you either have to go that route and put it in
> kioslaves/kio-extras/whatever (so that it will hopefully *keep*
> working), or declare it dead on the basis no-one cares enough to bother
> maintaining it.
> 
> To a large extent, I would consider this the decision of whoever
> volunteers to maintain kio-extras (or whatever it gets called).

At least that makes more sense than spawning repositories like rabbits.
 
Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140408/9d4b9715/attachment.sig>