Review Request 113046: Move kconfigwidgets to tier3

[Aurélien Gâteau]

On Wednesday 02 October 2013 14:48:45 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 October 2013 12:06:57 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> > I don't have any strong opinion on this, but if we allow tier2
> >> > frameworks to depend on other tier2 frameworks then is there a need for
> >> > tier3 at all? Your wiki pages seems to indicate there is no need for
> >> > it.
> >> 
> >> That wiki page predates the Randa meeting, where some stuff was made
> >> more- concrete. I don't know of any reason to not let tier2 depend on
> >> tier2 though.
> > 
> > Still, what would be the difference between tier2 and tier3 if tier2
> > frameworks were allowed to depend on other tier2 frameworks?
> 
> I don't know.
> 
> I don't see any benefit of 3 tiers instead of 2. I'd collapse tier3 into
> tier2 if it was my decision :).

I agree with this, but I think you should start a separate thread to discuss 
this topic, otherwise it is going to be missed by David, Kevin and others.

For now I am going to move kconfigwidgets to tier3, will be simple to move it 
to tier2 with the others if your proposal is accepted.

Aurélien