topic request for next week's meeting: build requirements for kf5

[Aaron J. Seigo]

Hi,

Post 4.11, we will be encouraging as many people working on Workspace stuff as 
possible to move over to KF5 (inc plasma-framework). It will be critical to 
have a clear, (accurately) documented and reliable build (and update) recipe.

Given the feedback in the last few weeks on building kf5, it is apparent that 
right now we lack that. So I would like to propose this as a topic for next 
week's Wednesday KF5 irc meeting.

Specifically, I'd like to see if we can find consensus on:

* cmake requirements (version of cmake, e-m-c; how to update those in future)
* qt5 (with a clear recipe that works, including for updating)
* kf5 build commitments  (dependency changes and API change scheduling)

Is that acceptable?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130521/02f329db/attachment.sig>