KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboudeaux at gmx.com
Mon Jun 3 12:16:38 UTC 2013


On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few days
> > ago,  which we have already in e-c-m, but he can't use it because it is
> > not
> > released
> 
> Could we maybe release a first version of ECM with only find modules, and
> without the frameworks stuff ? Obviously KF5 wouldn't be able to use that,
> so it would keep depending on ECM-from-git (and we could still change the
> API for that stuff if needed, which I assume is the reason for Stephen's
> "no"). But this way, Qt4/KDE4 apps could start using ECM, for shared find
> modules.

I see a couple issues:
- http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11/Buildsystem/FindFilesSurvey is 
far from being done. some of the modules have to be refreshed to be compliant 
with CMake's standards (coding style, macro usage, variables names,casing...). 
The "upstream?" comment is also confusing, ie I have no idea what the criteria 
are before submitted a Findxxx.cmake upstream or let it live in ecm.

- Unless http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/2012-February/008499.html is fixed, I'd also recommend to stay far away from e-c-m.

> 
> I wonder how you plan to handle the conflicts between ECM and kdelibs4's
> cmake modules, though...

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130603/3ed98c87/attachment.sig>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list