Fancy header policy

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but
> notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy
> headers. Is there any policy on what needs to be done about it?
> 
> Some of the fancy headers, such as the Nepomuk ones, should just be
> discarded.
> 
> Should the others be moved to their respective frameworks in a special
> include folder? So 'include/Solid/*' would move to
> 'tier1/solid/includes/' ?

The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think anyone 
put the work in yet.
 
> Also, under what folder name should there includes be installed?
> Currently the fancy includes are installed in a KDE folder
> (/include/KDE/fancyHeaders). Do we want to continue with that? Or just
> install them in the specific folder. Eg - Solid headers would now be
> installed in include/Solid/ instead of include/KDE/Solid/

I see no problem having them still installed in a KDE folder. Maybe we want 
that to become KF5 though to help with co-installation of major versions.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130723/ca46a5a5/attachment.sig>