"kde5" or "kf5" ?

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Sunday 17 February 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 16, 2013 18:41:34 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > There is no kde5.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Everything refering to software, pathes and all that should be kf5.
> > > > It does
> > > > not make sense for our libs, neither does it make sense for
> > > > frameworks.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > (Branding point of view, ignore at will. :P)
> > > 
> > > The tool kde4-config has also been renamed to kde5-config.
> > > 
> > > So if we go with "kde5", I don't see a strong reason to use "kf5" in
> > > the plugin install directory.
> > 
> > Just to be clear (I think I wasn't in my previous email): it should be
> > kf5, not kde5.
> 
> Just to be clear too, I don't have a strong opinion on the naming, but if
> we continue to say that KDE based on kf5 will still be KDE 4, then we
> should not use "kde5" in various places.
> 
> What will the version number of the first KDE SC release based on KDE
> frameworks be actually ?

Any opinions on this ?
Will it be e.g. KDE SC 4.15 ?
This would sound more like a normal minor release, but I expect we'll have a 
few regressions here and there.

Alex