framework names (Re: Let's get in release mode!)

[Aurélien Gâteau]

On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:25:02 +0100, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
>> itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
>
> Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
> this will be in line with karchive and most others (this doesn't 
> change the
> actual framework target name or the library name).
> Anyone up for doing this today?
>
> Aurélien: so apidox is useful to all kde software?

It is used to build all docs on api.kde.org, which covers most of KDE 
SC
I think.

> Then it could be kdeapidox or kapidox or something like that, right?

Both are equally undescriptive, but I don't have any better 
suggestions,
so I am fine with either :)

> I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
> assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?

Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating menus
in the sidebar and handling cross-doxygen search (though that bit could
use some improvements). It should at some point include the work I did
on dependency diagram generation.

Aurélien