Let's get in release mode!

[Aurélien Gâteau]

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you 
>> plan to
>> fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to "Get the 
>> dependency
>> graph generator script ready", "Have the frameworks on api.kde.org" 
>> (already
>> did some work in that area last week,
>> http://api.kde.org/frameworks/kdelibs-apidocs/ looks more complete 
>> now) and
>> I'd like to help with "Reduce the KDE footprint in ECM as much as
>> possible".
>
> As usual, put your name next to it when you turn it into "in
> progress". I pre-
> allocated a couple because I knew some discussion was going on (maybe 
> I
> shouldn't have).

OK, will do.

>> Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks 
>> branch of the
>> kdelibs repository after the split? Is it going to be removed or is 
>> it
>> going to stay there with the framework folders pointing to the 
>> framework
>> repositories through git sub-modules? The work on the graph 
>> generator and
>> api.kde.org will be different depending on what the branch becomes.
>
> Consider it removed from the graph generator pov. Technically it'll 
> stay but
> will be frozen (no push allowed).

Do you have a plan to indicate which tier a framework belongs to? My
kf5dot tool relies on folder names right now, but it's not going to 
work
anymore. I am thinking there should be either a standard
meta-information file in the root of each framework repository, or a
standard variable set within CMake which we can grep out (a bit ugly).

Aurélien