Forcing Q_SLOTS on non frameworks code

[Kevin Ottens]

On Saturday 14 December 2013 13:55:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi there, so here I am at the KF5 porting sprint at Barcelona trying to port
> libkdegames and I am realizing that I can not use code like
> 
>   private slots:
> 
> anymore.
> 
> I understand that for frameworks libraries it is interesting to have
> -DQT_NO_SIGNALS_SLOTS_KEYWORDS defined so we end up with code that is as
> widely includable from anywhere, but forcing that to the rest of the world
> is a bit too much if you ask me.

I don't think that was intended.
 
> Can we somehow make it so that people using frameworks are not forced to add
> a remove_definitions so they get their code compiling?

Definitely need to be fixed... we need to find what ends up activating it for 
everyone. I would guess you get the same thing for the implicit ascii casts? 
That would not be intended either.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131214/51438bcb/attachment.sig>