Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Diumenge, 8 de desembre de 2013, a les 10:16:36, Martin Graesslin va 
escriure:
> Hi,
> 
> at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically
> wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite
> some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use
> xml gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).
> 
> My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework:
> * kglobalaccel.cpp
> * kglobalaccel.h
> * kglobalaccel_p.h
> * kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
> * kglobalshortcutinfo.h
> * kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
> * kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
> * org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
> * org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml
> 
> From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the
> dependencies are:
> * QtCore
> * QtDBus
> * QtWidgets
> * QtX11Extras
> 
> Opinions?

Not an oposition but...

Is there no other tier1 framework where it would fit logically and dependency 
wise?

Sometimes I have the fear we might be splitting a bit too much (which can 
result in nightmare for release and package people amonsght otther stuff).

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers
> Martin
> 
> P.S. I blame Aurélien and his diagrams for this proposal. It made me look
> into the dependencies of KWin and I had a "wtf why are we linking sonnet?"
> moment and looked into what we used of XmlGui.