Review Request 111916: Port khtml_part away from kde_file.h
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Mon Aug 12 09:40:21 UTC 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/#review37565
-----------------------------------------------------------
khtml/khtml_part.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/#comment27760>
Is this variable still used?
khtml/khtml_part.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/#comment27761>
You reversed the condition. stat() returns 0 on success. So, no "!" before exists.
khtml/khtml_part.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/#comment27763>
That's not what lstat does....
The case where stat() fails and lstat() succeeds is the case of a broken symlink.
In that case, QFileInfo::exists() returns false. I guess all we can do then is skip this second check, and use if (info.isSymlink()) below, without ok&& in front. I.e. always go into the symlink code, whether the symlink is valid or broken.
- David Faure
On Aug. 12, 2013, 9:35 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 9:35 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Port khtml_part away from kde_file.h
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> khtml/khtml_part.cpp d944a29
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111916/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Compiles. The tests seem to segfault with and without this patch. I'll try to diagnose it.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vishesh Handa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130812/21a0c1c2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list