Porting KWidgets to Qt5

[David Faure]

On Monday 09 July 2012 17:26:46 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
> priority is to port as much kde as code as possible. And i didn't even try
> to port d'n'd related signals for same reasons as Jeremy says - API should
> be minimal.

IMHO if we can get in the 3 new signals and not the one without arguments, 
this will be good enough by far.

Having to write an if() in a slot is perfectly fine, and much less work than in 
the current situation.
And having both signals, with and without args, is actually quite confusing.


PS: calling people stupid won't get you far in terms of respect within the Qt 
community.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Sponsored by Nokia to work on KDE, incl. KDE Frameworks 5