Requiring Qt5 ?

[David Faure]

On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:28:29 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> now that Qt 5.0.0 has been released, what is the plan with requiring it ?
> ASAP or wait to see whether there are issues with it ?

I would like to drop Qt4 support now, yes. The only condition is, as discussed 
here recently, that all unittests should pass first with Qt5 (so can start from 
a clean baseline, and not have to wonder if a failure comes from a Qt4/Qt5 
difference or from the KF5 changes).

Current state on my machine:
* kcalendartest fails due to ki18n move (Jon/John, please fix or simply add 
expected failures if everything is logical in the current state of things)
* ktoolbar_unittest, Qt5 bug, for me to fix I guess
* kfileplacesmodeltest, for Kévin to fix
* plasma-runnercontexttest and plasma-storage - I just wrote in #plasma with 
hope, after fixing the obvious stuff a few days ago.

If you (anyone) experience anything else, please debug, fix, or report here.
(Make sure to do this in a separate dbus session as indicated on the wiki 
page; I'll look into fixing kio|klauncher so that this isn't necessary anymore)

> I guess libinqt5/ can be removed then ?

Yes, and kde_qt5_compat.h.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks