Config files for frameworks (Was: KArchive for Qt4)

[Stephen Kelly]

Alexander Neundorf wrote:

> yes, but forgot to answer.
> No strong reason here. The options containing "HAVE" are based on whether
> that thing existed on the system where the library was built. This one is
> independent on whether udisk2 existed on that system, so I thought "USE"
> might be better.
> I might also use "USE" for all those options...

Ah, actually I misread the comment. I thought the udisks2 one was about 
using the 'system' udisks2.

We've used HAVE for variables like this before, right? Is that the common 
way?

Thanks,

Steve.