Maintainership of Kig

[Maurizio Paolini]

I am entering the discussion as one of the developers of parts
of kig, and I am very glad that there is interest in the maintainership.

It is a long time since I last heard from Pino, and my guess is
that he has little time to devote to kig... a change in the
maintainership of kig could revitalize the project, which lately
was somewhat slow.

Best thing would be to have a word directly from Pino with his opinion.
I know that he is active in the Italian kde localization team, so I
will also cc this email to his address as found in the web pages
of the italian localization team.

Maurizio

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:14:39AM -0500, David Narvaez wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As I'm pushing a rather large refactoring into Kig's master branch,
> preparing for some feature implementations for 4.10, I was wondering
> if it is a good time to request an official status of maintainer of
> Kig. That would, for example, include stuff like assigning new Kig
> bugs to me etc; not exactly because of recognition but because
> administratively, the decisions are no longer responsibility of the
> project managers currently listed in projects.kde.org and it is unfair
> to keep assigning bugs to Pino if those are caused by recent feature
> implementations.
> 
> I could elaborate more on any of the points above if needed. Thanks in
> advance for your feedback.
> 
> David E. Narváez
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu