Kpairs Theme Schema

[Aleix Pol]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Marco Calignano <marco.calignano at web.de>wrote:

>  Hello everyone,
>
> Aleix and I discussed a bit the scheme for a theme in kpairs (the new name
> of kmemory due to trademark problem).
> The suggestion is the following:
>
>
>
>    1. <?xml version="1.0"?>
>     2.
>     3. <pairs>
>     4.   <title>Zoo</title>
>     5.   <description>Little zoo</description> <!--todo: we'll have to
>    figure out how to get this translated-->
>     6.   <author>Marco Calignano</author>
>     7.   <date>21/03/2012</date> <!-- can be useful for versioning?-->
>     8.
>     9.   <!-- we can use the same semantics as in the elements -->
>     10.   <sound type='missed' src='missed.ogg' />
>     11.   <sound type='found' src='found.ogg' />
>     12.   <image type='back' src='zoo.svg' />
>     13.
>     14.   <main type='image' />
>     15.
>     16.   <!-- now come the list of the elements -->
>     17.   <element>
>     18.     <sound src='lion.ogg' />
>     19.     <video src='lion.ogv' />
>     20.     <image src='lion.svg' pref='1'/>
>     21.     <image src='baby_lion.svg' pref='2'/>
>     22.     <word lang='en'>lion</word>
>     23.   </element>
>     24. </pairs>
>
>
> We wanted to open the discussion with everyone in the list.
>
> Greetings
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
>
>
Hi,
The purpose of this e-mail was more to know if interested people thinks this
specification is useful, not "how do you think it can be changed?".

Do you think it fulfills our needed use cases?

Thanks...
Aleix

PS: Regarding kvtml, I'm not sure what's the advantage, I'm open to it but I
don't think it makes sense to adopt it just because it's flexible enough.
(in the end, it's all xml...)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-edu/attachments/20110901/4aad6f5c/attachment.html>