[kde-edu]: Re: Preparation for the move to git

Peter Hedlund peter at peterandlinda.com
Fri Feb 4 00:55:03 CET 2011


On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Peter Hedlund <peter at peterandlinda.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Daniel Laidig wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 03 February 2011 22:56:13 Peter Hedlund wrote:
> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> >>> Hi KDE-Edu devels,
> >>>
> >>> Now that kdelibs and kdebase have been moved to git, the rest of KDE will
> >>> soon follow. Ian "eean" kindly offered to write the rules for kdeedu,
> >>> thanks to him!
> >>>
> >>> Before the move we need to ensure that all subprojects build standalone
> >>> (without breaking the overall kdeedu build as well).
> >>> KBruch maintainer Sebastian did that earlier today
> >>> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdeedu/kbruch/CMakeLists.txt?r1=1009581&r
> >>> 2=1218675
> >>>
> >>> While it's easy for small projects, it is probably a bit more work for
> >>> Marble which is more complex. Can the Marble team look into it quite
> >>> quickly? Any problems can be discussed here and if necessary we'll ask
> >>> for help. Same for KStars.
> >>> We also need to take care of the libs as we discussed and noted on
> >>> http://community.kde.org/KDE_Edu#Git_Migration
> >>
> >> Without cmake and library development skills it's definitely the handling
> >> of the keduvocdocument lib that is giving me problems. Either we keep all
> >> applications using it together or I/we need help making a proper library
> >> out of it.
> >
> > What happened to the patch Niko Sams  wrote in December? Didn't it already do
> > all this (i.e. create proper libraries and cmake modules and make apps build
> > standalone)?
> 
> OK, good. I found it. The patch needs to be updated due to all the fixes done by Marco to several cmake files.
> 
> If an up to date patch is applied I don't anticipate any problems migrating KWordQuiz.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> 
> >> Anne-Marie, how do you plan to handle KHangMan since it is one of the
> >> programs using it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kde-edu mailing list
> >> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-edu mailing list
> > kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> 
> Why don't we commit these patches to svn already and remove kdeedu/CMakeLists.txt?
> 
> That way the responsability to have each app compiling is the maintainer, and that's what we're looking for, right?

Sounds like a plan to me.

Peter




More information about the kde-edu mailing list