[kde-doc-english] Documentation pages on techbase

[Burkhard Lück]

Am Thursday 28 April 2016, 08:34:43 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan:
> написане Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:08:59 +0300, Luigi Toscano
> 
> <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>:
> > Burkhard Lück ha scritto:
> >> Am Wednesday 20 April 2016, 17:01:52 schrieb Burkhard Lück:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> we have some pages about Documentation on techbase like
> >>> 
> >>> Projects/Documentation
> >>> 
> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4
> >>> 
These pages need to be updated, if we want to keep them

> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4/kdepim/kmail
> >>> 
Projects/Documentation/KDE4/kdepim and all subpages have to be deleted -> 8 
years old and just a draft

> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)
> >>> 
> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE_(health_table)/kcontrol5
> >>> 
> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)/kcontrol
> >>> 
> >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)/kioslaves
> >>> 
KDE4_(health_table) pages have to be renamed (KDE4 is wrong) + moved

Projects/Documentation/Building_Blocks -> delete it, we have the fundamentals 
docbooks

community has already a page about Documentation (https://community.kde.org/
KDE_Documentation), but that is apparently only about Documentation in Wiki.
How to handle this? The main content is > 6 years old.

> >>> ... and maybe more. How to find them?
> >>> 
> >>> These pages are somewhat outdated (kde4) and should be on
> >>> community.kde.org,
> >>> right?
> >>> 
> >>> Techbase has a page Documentation_Primer/Manual version 0.03
> >>> 2013-05-01 and
> >>> we have another version 0.02 (2005-05-21) l10n.kde.org, that does not
> >>> make sense and should be cleaned up.
> >> 
Lets remove the Documentation Primer 0.02 from l10n.kde.org and replaced it 
with a link to the latest page.

> > 
> > IRC discussion (#kde-docs):
> > 
> > [22:59:40] <tosky> blueck: hi, about the pages on techbase, ping
> > ochurlaud who
> > is helping with the reorganization of wikis
> > [23:01:50] <blueck> tosky: so you agree the pages should go to community?
> > [23:02:02] <tosky> blueck: most likely, yes
> > [23:03:23] <blueck> tosky: I'd like to push
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127758/ any comments/review?
> > [23:03:29] <tosky> blueck: the documentation primer was copied there to
> > edit
> > it in a easier way, iirc; claus_chr and yurchor should remember the story
> > [23:04:40] <blueck> tosky: ok, I'll ask yurchor. but then we should
> > remove the
> > outdated primer from l10n.k.o
> > [23:05:12] <tosky> blueck: I don't think that the wiki version was really
> > updated, and I have a dejavu about this discussion :)
> > [23:06:25] <blueck> tosky:  lets take this discussion to the mailinglist
> > yurchor can explain
> > [23:08:13] <tosky> sure
> > [23:08:20] <tosky> can I copy&paste this discussion?
> > [23:08:40] <blueck> tosky: yes please
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have not answered in this discussion because the reason to move the
> pages to community is unclear for me. 

https://kate-editor.org/2010/07/26/the-mission-of-kdes-wikis/

-- 
Burkhard Lück