[kde-doc-english] commiting patches

Philip Rodrigues philip.rodrigues at chch.ox.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 16:23:18 CET 2005


> My own opinion is: PLEASE do commit but always CCMAIL the commit log to the
> program maintainer!

Agreed. One minor thing - check the docs with checkXML rather than meinproc. 
There are one or two corner cases where errors aren't picked up by meinproc 
but are picked up by checkXML.

Also, apologies that your bug reports weren't picked up sooner - most of the 
docs team have been quite busy with RL, I think, so we've got a bit behind 
with things.

> A question that is worrying me: are these commits automatically synched
> with trunk?

Not that I know of. We're a bit uncertain of what to do about trunk (since any 
changes we make there could quite likely become obsolete by the time KDE 4 is 
released). Does anyone have any thoughts?

Regards,
Philip
-- 
KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
KDE Documentation Online: http://docs.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20051114/fd6a9dca/attachment.sig 


More information about the kde-doc-english mailing list