[kde-doc-english]releaseinfo

Éric Bischoff e.bischoff at noos.fr
Mon Feb 3 11:50:35 CET 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Monday 03 February 2003 11:44, Lauri Watts a écrit:
>
> For a KDE app where the documentation will be stored in KDE CVS, we use the
> version of the application in both cases.  That's because we keep the
> documents in CVS, which provides more than enough revision history for the
> document itself, so all that matters for readers is the version of the
> application that it applies to.
>
> For a third party application, you could either keep records in comments,
> use the revisioninfo elements (I can't promise they will render anything
> sensible, we don't use them) or just make a list in a section if you want.
> If you take that course, I advise, put it at the end somewhere, most
> readers really aren't interested in revisions of the document, and don't
> care much about revisions of the application either, they only want to know
> what the version they have right now can do for them.  That's not to say it
> isn't valuable information for the author, just that the average end-user
> is not interested.

Yup, and the authors have the CVS log anyway.

I'm in favour of keeping the <releaseinfo> of the _application_ and doing the 
rest in the CVS logs.

- -- 
According to a recent survey, 82% of the citizens of the
European Union are against American planned invasion of Irak.
(EOS Gallup Europe, 15,080 people aged 15+, 21st to 27th January 2003)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+Pkl7fYJTRPWp6rkRApY/AJwM9P2e0Y4WQSHntkHiFVCYXt6xswCdGYy1
LGjpyVWzJfj13KxuC/QP61Y=
=zW9z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the kde-doc-english mailing list