Regarding the policy proposal

[Thiago Masato Costa Sueto]

Hi,

As most of you know, the last LLM policy proposal draft got rather heated,
to say the least. It was locked and made confidential.

I'd like to overtake the work for a new proposal. I've been brainstorming
this idea for several months at this point, even making a stance document
for my own personal use (with decent reception from the people I showed it
to).

I was recommended to keep the new proposal private to be workshopped with
well established contributors first, and only when it's mature enough make
it public.

Since a significant number of people was at Akademy, it's reasonable to
wait at least a week for people to rest and settle in after returning from
the trip. That's the minimum timeframe for people to actually have a chance
to engage with this subject I believe.

I actually already have an initial draft ready. It already addresses most
of the issues present in the previous draft, with some opinionatedness of
course. I'm rather confident it should have generally good reception, and
that we can focus only on working the thing out and seeing where it goes
from there.

As to how to organize this "private sharing with core contributors", I was
thinking of a temporary private repository with collaborator invites so we
can make comments on individual parts more easily (since Gitlab lacks
private MRs). I feel like the mailing list made the discussion very
difficult to keep track of. We could also just do the Easy Way and make a
confidential issue, but I was recommended against it, as the Confidential
setting would still include all people with dev accounts.

Thanks,
Thiago / Herz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20260927/9001396a/attachment.htm>