Are we out of work next month?

[Christian Ehrlicher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Kümmel schrieb:
> ANSWER (from the lyx-devel list):
> 
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> I understood that Qt 4 will require changes to user code, no? LyX
>>> 1.3.6 , therefore, won't use it. LyX 1.4 is in feature freeze, so I
>>> guess that it won't use it either. Looks like you'll be having
>>> considerable usage for a while yet.
> 
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>'Excessive changes' would be a bit of an understatement. It took my
>>about 30% of the original development time to port some Qt 3.3
>>application prototype to Qt 4 beta...
>>[On the pro side, Qt 4 is more fun to work with than 3.x ...]
> 
>>> LyX 1.3.6 , therefore, won't use it. LyX 1.4 is in feature freeze, so
>>> I guess that it won't use it either. Looks like you'll be having
>>> considerable usage for a while yet.
> 
>>Qt 4 is no go for LyX 1.4 as far as I am concerned...
> 
> 
> BUT
> 
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> We will probably have to tweak LyX 1.4 to work (in qt3 compatibility
>> mode) with it at some point.
I don't think that there will be much progress after 4.0 release. I'll
maybe only port some really needed code back to 3.3 (if this is
possible) and try to get 4.0 compile with msvc & borland. There wasn't
much response on our binary 3.3 relases and also noone except me seems
to have time to fix bugs nor someone will get a working site on
qtwin.sf.net. It's a little bit disappointing  ...

Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCsInznNKwkgf+zVMRAuxNAKCaltmVlx23sX93YGk1I+Jj9NNHAwCgjlhJ
TTUDAiPLWwSaHEjKgAp40CE=
=L+Yn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----