QPL licensing

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

I speak on the behaf  of the code from Wolfpack =)

Sure.

PS: Wouldn't we actually be required to do so? Since the x11/unix files had
that license, removing would be relicense which we can't do.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ivan de Jesus Deras" <ivan_deras at yahoo.es>
To: "For developers interested in porting KDE to Windows using Cygwin"
<kde-cygwin at kde.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: QPL licensing


There's no problem with me, go ahead.

--- Chris January <chris at atomice.net> escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > before doing these changes, could you please
> check, if the
> > original _x11
> > files, which i created the _win files from also
> have the QPL
> > license in
> > them ?
> >
> > if they don´t have them, i don´t think you can add
> the QPL to
> > the files. if
> > they were only under GPL, adding the QPL would be
> the same as
> > adding for
> > example the QT commercial license.
> >
> > the original _x11 files are still in cvs in the
> qt-2 repository.
>
> Yes they do - I just checked. I think the free
> version of Qt was licensed
> under the QPL before it was licensed under the GPL.
>
> I can't change the license without every copyright
> holder's consent though
> so if you have contributed code and haven't replied
> to this thread yet
> please do so.
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-cygwin mailing list
> kde-cygwin at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-cygwin
>





______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡100 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
_______________________________________________
kde-cygwin mailing list
kde-cygwin at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-cygwin