win95/unicode

[chris at atomice.net]

On Fri Nov 12 21:31 , Peter Kuemmel <kuemmel at coffeelogic.de> sent:

>Chris January wrote:
>>>But, do we need the definitions of qt_windows with the 
>>>highest possible _WIN32_WINDOWS and WINVER values?
>> 
>> If we don't set it to the highest possible values then defines for features
>> only present in later versions will not be included (since they will are
>> guarded by #if WINVER>0x0500, etc. lines) and we will have to re-define them
>> in qt_windows.h.
>
>My thinking and writing was different! my real question is:
>
>But, do we need the definitions in qt_windows
>WHEN we use the highest possible _WIN32_WINDOWS and WINVER values?
>
>I think, when we use the highest values we can remove
>all the SPI_GETKEYBOARDCUES, WM_MOUSEWHEEL, WM_MOUSEHOVER and WM_MOUSELEAVE
>definitions.

Yes - you're quite right. Defining WINVER and _WIN32_WINDOWS to the highest
values means we can get rid of these definitions (assuming, of course, the
include files are complete).

Chris