Application usage statistics and targeted user surveys

[Aleix Pol]

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Volker Krause <vkrause at kde.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 May 2017 12:33:49 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 18:31:35 CEST Aleix Pol wrote:
>> > I would have looked into fixing it, but I'm not sure I understand why
>> > there's all the RPATH logic in place, so I'd prefer to hear from you
>> > first.
>>
>> I have removed the remains of the pre-ECM rpath handling. This also changed
>> binary output directories on Linux to follow KDE standards, so you might
>> want to do a clean build to avoid issues with outdated binaries in the
>> build dir.
>> > A good next step would also be to get it running on build.kde.org, so
>> > we can identify these issues.
>>
>> Indeed, I've requested CI coverage now.
>
> Looks like in order to get CI coverage we need to move to kdereview (which is
> fine, I think it's ready for that), but that requires to know where this
> should end up afterwards.
>
> I guess the candidates are extragear/libs or frameworks? frameworks seems
> conceptually like the right place, but putting something there that is still
> fairly new and has seen little field testing seems sub-optimal. Opinions?

+1
Since we're still introducing it to projects maybe it could make sense
to have a couple of releases with it in extragear so people will be
less angry if we needed to break ABI (it's what we did for kirigami,
and I'd say it's worked reasonably well).
At Akademy we can discuss to get it in frameworks if it works for everyone?

Aleix