Application usage statistics and targeted user surveys

[Volker Krause]

On Thursday, 25 May 2017 12:33:49 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 18:31:35 CEST Aleix Pol wrote:
> > I would have looked into fixing it, but I'm not sure I understand why
> > there's all the RPATH logic in place, so I'd prefer to hear from you
> > first.
> 
> I have removed the remains of the pre-ECM rpath handling. This also changed
> binary output directories on Linux to follow KDE standards, so you might
> want to do a clean build to avoid issues with outdated binaries in the
> build dir.
> > A good next step would also be to get it running on build.kde.org, so
> > we can identify these issues.
> 
> Indeed, I've requested CI coverage now.

Looks like in order to get CI coverage we need to move to kdereview (which is 
fine, I think it's ready for that), but that requires to know where this 
should end up afterwards. 

I guess the candidates are extragear/libs or frameworks? frameworks seems 
conceptually like the right place, but putting something there that is still 
fairly new and has seen little field testing seems sub-optimal. Opinions?

Regards,
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20170603/6fb17e23/attachment.sig>